Unalike Marketing
AI marketing hub

AI marketing for Canadian SMBs.

Show up in ChatGPT, Perplexity, AI Overviews, and Google AI Mode. Run AI workflows that actually save time. Pick the AI tools that don't burn your budget on hype.

Most-cited AI-marketing playbooks for Canadian SMBs

  • 27 playbooksAI search + workflows
  • GEO + AEO + LLM SEOAll three covered
  • Vertical-awareDental, law, automotive, healthcare
  • Updated quarterlyAI moves fast, so do we

Questions buyers ask.

Is "AEO" / "GEO" / "LLM SEO" actually different from regular SEO?
Mostly the same skill set, applied to different surfaces. The shared layer: clean structured data, clear topical authority, citation-worthy formatting. The differences: AEO weights answer-shaped paragraph chunks more heavily; GEO weights authoritative source-of-truth content; LLM training cycles mean refresh cadence matters more than for Google. If an agency tells you AEO requires a wholly separate retainer, they're upsell-pricing a layer that should sit inside your normal SEO scope.
How do I show up in ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews?
Honest answer: there is no "submit to ChatGPT" button — you earn citations by being the most authoritative, citation-shaped source on a query. That means: exact-question-answering paragraphs, clear schema, real third-party authority signals, and consistent presence across the LLM training corpora (Wikipedia, GitHub, Reddit, high-domain-authority publications). The 27-article shelf below has the specifics by surface.
Should I add an llms.txt file to my site?
It's cheap and harmless to add (which is the honest framing — there's no proven ranking signal yet). Recommended pattern: a curated llms.txt at root pointing to your canonical pillar URLs and your most-citable content. It signals intent to the LLM crawlers that have started respecting it (Anthropic, Perplexity in some cases). It does NOT replace structured data, internal links, or topical authority. See the llms-txt-guide article in this section for the template we ship for clients.
Will AI Overviews kill my SEO traffic?
Some of it, yes — informational top-of-funnel queries already lose 30-60% of click-through to AI Overviews on the queries where they fire (Pew, Sistrix, BrightEdge data 2025-2026). The defensible play: own commercial-intent and decision-stage queries ("vs", "alternatives", "pricing", "how to evaluate X") where AI Overviews are still rare or low-coverage, AND structure your top-of-funnel content as the citation source AI Overviews link to. The all-or-nothing framing is wrong; most SMBs need both moves.
What about AI for content writing — won't Google penalize it?
Google's stance: "AI-generated content is fine if it's helpful." Practical translation: AI-only spam content gets caught by Helpful Content / Spam Updates; AI-assisted content with real human voice + verified facts ranks the same as fully human-written. We use AI inside the production loop (research, outline, first-draft) but the voice DNA, fact-check, and editorial pass are human — see content-generation rules in the AI shelf below.

Got A Question?

Get in touch. We'll respond soon, so together, we can take a bite out of the competition.

CallEmail